Shareholder wealth maximisation
is used to choose as firm objective by corporation in value management.
Although, many firms do not use shareholder value as the most important goal,
the increasing threat of takeover by teams of managers searching for poorly
managed businesses changes abovementioned situation. In 2011, Netflix share
prices reduce from $304 to $70 as its DVD price increasing strategy. In
addition, Blackberry loss it 77% shares because its PlayBook tablet strategy.
According to examples on Netflix and blackberry, it could be found that
shareholder wealth are influenced by corporate strategy significantly.
Comparing shareholder value-based
management, earnings-based management leads some drawbacks which are:
Accounting is subject to
distortions and manipulations;
The investment made is often
inadequately represented;
The time value of money is
excluded from the calculation;
Risk is not considered
In addition, there is one more
issue could be existed in earnings per share which is the price to earnings
ratio seems to not fairly price an asset. For example, the EPS and P/E would be
different under identical assets but different equity as the difference in net
income and tax.
|
Firm A
|
Firm B
|
|
|
2004
|
1.5
|
1.8
|
|
2005
|
1.6
|
1.0
|
|
2006
|
1.7
|
2.3
|
|
2007
|
1.8
|
1.5
|
|
2008
|
2.
|
2.0
|
Therefore, shareholder wealth maximisation should be
considered as a corporate goal. Analysing above table, firm a shareholder value
could be considered more than firm B as it low standard deviation in firm A
shows low risks. There are 5 actions could create value such as increasing the
return on existing capital, raising investment in positive spread units,
divesting assets, extending the planning horizon and lowering the required rate
of return.
Then, based on that result, Rappaport (2006) has defined
10 ways to create shareholder value.
1. Do not
manage earnings or provide earnings guidance
2. Make
Strategic Decisions that maximize expected value, even at the expense of
lowering near-term earnings
3. Make
acquisitions that maximize expected value, even at the expense of lowering
near-term earnings.
4. Carry
only assets that maximize value
5. Return
cash to shareholders when there are no credible value-creating opportunities to
invest in the business.
6. Reward
CEOs and other senior executive for delivering superior long-term returns.
7. Reward
operating-unit executives for adding superior multiyear value
8. Reward
middle managers and frontline employees for delivering superior performance on
the key value drivers that they influence directly.
9. Require
senior executives to bear the risks of ownership just as shareholders do.
10. Provide
investors with value-relevant information.
However, although those ten ways could help create
long-term shareholder value for most corporations, some corporations should
carefully approach those methods, in particular high-tech corporations. The
reason of that is IT corporations development have highly sensitive relationship
with shareholders price. As a high risk and high return of high-tech
corporations, the return expectation of those corporation investors would much
higher than other types of corporation shareholders. When share price goes
down, less attraction would get by investors rapidly and those high-tech
corporations may loss fund support for investors. Moreover, as high-tech
corporations used to have long-term research and development cycle time, the
less fund support would easier to let those corporations into capital shortage.
Then, the corporations would turn to a vicious circle. Therefore, for those
high-tech corporations, the manager should may much attention on short-term
profit strategy to attract its shareholders.
All in all, shareholder wealth maximization is generally reflecting
a corporation value at most time. 10 ten above-mentioned ways would help to
most corporations, except high-tech corporations. For those high-tech
corporations, long-term strategy is important and profit value should still be
considered.
Bibliography: Rappaport, A. (2006). Ten ways to create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review, 84(9), 66--77.
No comments:
Post a Comment